home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: ccshst01.cs.uoguelph.ca!bmoir
- From: bmoir@uoguelph.ca (Benjamin Moir)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Borland C++ => Watcom. Is this so wrong?
- Date: 3 Jan 1996 05:30:57 GMT
- Organization: University of Guelph
- Message-ID: <4cd4ah$69i@ccshst05.cs.uoguelph.ca>
- References: <4c467m$44h@news.infi.net>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ccshst01.cs.uoguelph.ca
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Guy L. Winterbotham (glwinter@roanoke.infi.net) wrote:
- : I am about to upgrade. I can either wait for BCPP v5.0 or jump to
- : Watcomm. I use third party crossplatform GUI libs and comms libs and so
- : do not need MFC or OWL. I need target support for DOS extended, DOS,
- : Windows 3.1 and probably OS/2. Watcom seems like the right idea. I like
- : the Borland IDE ( just becuase I am used to it ). Has anybody made this
- : move and have any real objection to it?
- : Regards,
- : Guy Winterbotham
-
- I have never made this transition, but, with Watcom, you will have to
- ensure that any 3rd party (static) LIBs are Watcom-compatible, or else
- have the source code to re-compile it/them to make them Watcom-compatible.
-
- Hope this helps...
-
- ben
-
-
-